Frederic W. Maitland, the pre-eminent Anglo-American legal historian, said that the trust "perhaps forms the most distinctive achievement of English lawyers. It seems to us almost essential to civilization and yet there is nothing quite like it in foreign law." This book is an updating of Maitland’s work, first looking at his suggested “foreign” sources for the trust—Roman law, German (Salic) law , and Franciscan “law”. It then considers a source Maitland did not – Islamic law – and finds that the Islamic waqf is not only “quite like” the trust, but predated it by at least five hundred years.
Frederic W. Maitland, the pre-eminent Anglo-American legal historian, said that the trust “perhaps forms the most distinctive achievement of English lawyers. It seems to us essential to civilization and yet there nothing quite like it in foreign law.” Maitland was wrong. There was, and is, an almost identical institution in Islamic law—the waqf. This book establishes the proof of that assertion. But it establishes much more than that. For it proves that the waqf pre-existed the English trust by at least five hundred years. And more generally, this work may be the oldest existing legal text devoted to a single subject. And the book is substantial evidence of the level of development and sophistication of classical Islamic law at a time when other major legal systems were still in their infancy.
Frederic W. Maitland, the pre-eminent Anglo-American legal historian, said that the trust “perhaps forms the most distinctive achievement of English lawyers. It seems to us essential to civilization and yet there nothing quite like it in foreign law.” Maitland was wrong. There was, and is, an almost identical institution in Islamic law—the waqf. This book establishes the proof of that assertion. But it establishes much more than that. For it proves that the waqf pre-existed the English trust by at least five hundred years. And more generally, this work may be the oldest existing legal text devoted to a single subject. And the book is substantial evidence of the level of development and sophistication of classical Islamic law at a time when other major legal systems were still in their infancy.
Frederic W. Maitland, the pre-eminent Anglo-American legal historian, said that the trust "perhaps forms the most distinctive achievement of English lawyers. It seems to us almost essential to civilization and yet there is nothing quite like it in foreign law." This book is an updating of Maitland’s work, first looking at his suggested “foreign” sources for the trust—Roman law, German (Salic) law , and Franciscan “law”. It then considers a source Maitland did not – Islamic law – and finds that the Islamic waqf is not only “quite like” the trust, but predated it by at least five hundred years.
Thank you for visiting our website. Would you like to provide feedback on how we could improve your experience?
This site does not use any third party cookies with one exception — it uses cookies from Google to deliver its services and to analyze traffic.Learn More.