Every day we interact with web pages, mobile applications, Web Apps and, for the past few years, what are also known as PWAs (Progressive Web Apps). These artefacts that make up the rich world that the web has become all have at least one thing in common: the forms that allow us to interact with its content, its creators and many other people. These forms have evolved quite a bit since the early days of the web. The first sources I found during my research date back to an interface called Archie, which offered a form for searching an index using FTP (File Transfer Protocol) on a local network. Nothing that didn't involve a great deal of interaction with others. With the Web Forms 1.0 standard, many of the new features adopted around these forms then stagnated until the need for change arose with mobile usage, particularly between 2008 and 2015. In fact, the Web Forms 2.0 standard was first written in 2008, the same year that I started to become a professional in the web field. The Web Forms 2.0 standard introduced with HTML 5 has brought us many new types of form fields: e-mail, URL, telephone, etc., as well as new APIs (Application Programming Interface) in JavaScript, and continues to evolve today much faster than in the past. Don't wait for a new version of HTML to update: HTML is a Living Standard, meaning that it has been constantly evolving since version 5. These technical developments, these fields and other new features are designed to keep pace with changes in usage, particularly in the habits of users of mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets, but also to enhance the possibilities for interaction on all the devices we use today. Despite all this progress, it's not uncommon to find forms with a deplorable user experience. How did we get to this point when technology is supposed to be helping us to improve the digital services we offer? My answer in one sentence: it's a gentle mix of responsibilities between (customer) service, design and ergonomics, accessibility and technology, which is leading our users to a deterioration in their experience of our websites and, more particularly, our forms. In other words, user and customer experience is a multi-stage, multi-stakeholder process that can be likened to a machine: if a single cog doesn't do its job, the whole process can go wrong. How can we introduce a better level of experience for our visitors? How can we monitor and measure this quality? Between accessibility, usability, user experience and search, user interface, HTML and CSS, let's take a quick look at the state of the art of web forms, and how we can improve all of this.
Oxford Student Texts offer an accessible route into the study of texts for A Level including line-by-line notes, and detailed sections covering key themes, issues and contexts. This edition focuses on The Merchant's Tale by Geoffrey Chaucer.
Every day we interact with web pages, mobile applications, Web Apps and, for the past few years, what are also known as PWAs (Progressive Web Apps). These artefacts that make up the rich world that the web has become all have at least one thing in common: the forms that allow us to interact with its content, its creators and many other people. These forms have evolved quite a bit since the early days of the web. The first sources I found during my research date back to an interface called Archie, which offered a form for searching an index using FTP (File Transfer Protocol) on a local network. Nothing that didn't involve a great deal of interaction with others. With the Web Forms 1.0 standard, many of the new features adopted around these forms then stagnated until the need for change arose with mobile usage, particularly between 2008 and 2015. In fact, the Web Forms 2.0 standard was first written in 2008, the same year that I started to become a professional in the web field. The Web Forms 2.0 standard introduced with HTML 5 has brought us many new types of form fields: e-mail, URL, telephone, etc., as well as new APIs (Application Programming Interface) in JavaScript, and continues to evolve today much faster than in the past. Don't wait for a new version of HTML to update: HTML is a Living Standard, meaning that it has been constantly evolving since version 5. These technical developments, these fields and other new features are designed to keep pace with changes in usage, particularly in the habits of users of mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets, but also to enhance the possibilities for interaction on all the devices we use today. Despite all this progress, it's not uncommon to find forms with a deplorable user experience. How did we get to this point when technology is supposed to be helping us to improve the digital services we offer? My answer in one sentence: it's a gentle mix of responsibilities between (customer) service, design and ergonomics, accessibility and technology, which is leading our users to a deterioration in their experience of our websites and, more particularly, our forms. In other words, user and customer experience is a multi-stage, multi-stakeholder process that can be likened to a machine: if a single cog doesn't do its job, the whole process can go wrong. How can we introduce a better level of experience for our visitors? How can we monitor and measure this quality? Between accessibility, usability, user experience and search, user interface, HTML and CSS, let's take a quick look at the state of the art of web forms, and how we can improve all of this.
The work of G. R. Elton has inspired its own 'Tudor Revolution' in the historiography of Tudor and Stuart government and society. In this volume a distinguished gathering of eighteen historians, all now resident in North America, pay tribute to Professor Elton's broad influence in shaping modern interpretations of the sixteenth- and seventeenth-century constitution. Each contributor to this volume has addressed, directly or indirectly, some aspect of that tempestuous age which has been dubbed 'Elton's era', and each of the sections relates directly to particular problems or topics which have figured prominently in Professor Elton's own work. Most extend his findings in new directions and with new evidence from archival researches. Others take issue with some of his tentative conclusions, though admitting the extent to which his work has made such advances possible.
Thank you for visiting our website. Would you like to provide feedback on how we could improve your experience?
This site does not use any third party cookies with one exception — it uses cookies from Google to deliver its services and to analyze traffic.Learn More.