Denial-of-service attacks are one of the most severe challenges confronting the online world. This ground-breaking volume discusses a new method of countering denial-of-service attacks called hop integrity. It details a suite of protocols for providing hop integrity. In particular, each protocol in this suite is specified and verified using an abstract and formal notation, called the Secure Protocol Notation. In addition, the book presents an alternative way to achieve strong hop integrity with hard sequence numbers.
There are two groups of researchers who are interested in designing network protocols and who cannot (yet) effectively communicate with one another c- cerning these protocols. The first is the group of protocol verifiers, and the second is the group of protocol implementors. The main reason for the lack of effective communication between these two groups is that these groups use languages with quite different semantics to specify network protocols. On one hand, the protocol verifiers use specification languages whose semantics are abstract, coarse-grained, and with large atom- ity. Clearly, protocol specifications that are developed based on such semantics are easier to prove correct. On the other hand, the protocol implementors use specification languages whose semantics are concrete, fine-grained, and with small atomicity. Protocol specifications that are developed based on such - mantics are easier to implement using system programming languages such as C, C++, and Java. To help in closing this communication gap between the group of protocol verifiers and the group of protocol implementors, we present in this monograph a protocol specification language called the Timed Abstract Protocol (or TAP, for short) notation. This notation is greatly influenced by the Abstract Protocol Notation in the textbook Elements of Network Protocol Design, written by the second author, Mohamed G. Gouda. The TAP notation has two types of sem- tics: an abstract semantics that appeals to the protocol verifiers and a concrete semantics thatappeals to the protocol implementors group.
Airworthiness regulatory bodies are authorised and responsible for verifying and ensuring the safety and reliability of aircraft. There are many civil and military aviation organisations and regulatory bodies. The functions and responsibilities of several of these organizations are summarised in this chapter. Owing to the importance of aircraft structural fatigue, a survey of fatigue design philosophies is also given. This is followed by (i) a discussion of the airworthiness certification methodology for materials and structures, starting with the initial mill products and proceeding via incremental levels to the finished aircraft; and (ii) an example of material certification for an aluminium–lithium (Al-Li) alloy that is a candidate for use in the airframes of light combat aircraft (LCA).
Proceedings of a June 1999 conference, describing new areas in distributed computing, including novel Internet applications, electronic commerce, mobile and nomadic systems, and groupware. Papers are arranged in sections on areas such as broadcast and multicast, fault-tolerance, operating systems, r
Thank you for visiting our website. Would you like to provide feedback on how we could improve your experience?
This site does not use any third party cookies with one exception — it uses cookies from Google to deliver its services and to analyze traffic.Learn More.